I’m guessing neither of you have advanced degrees from a tier 1 uni
No, I’m just ashamed to be part of a movement with increasingly low IQ thinking and stupid conspiracy theories. I bet you believe WTC7 fell from controlled demolition, moran.
It was a conspiracy by Islamic extremist terrorists who flew planes into two steel frame buildings. 99%+ of high IQ scientists and engineers agree on the cause: fires.
Keke
Anon, they said it was going to be demoed down the road due to the damage. Logical thinking. God bless you for trying though.
Anon, the buildings were made of steel, caught fire and fell. There’s a whole movement of science proving this beyond reasonable doubt. Of course it looks like the work of controlled demolition at first glance, but it wasn’t. Fires weakened the structure and the buildings fell. You can look into it yourself. It’s been proven by disinterested parties repeatedly.
Anon, that you’re assuming I’m not a NY’er is already showing that you’re not making logical conclusions.
The news reporter was speculating that the building would need to be demo’ed. They weren’t a C_A operative admitting to a controlled demolition on live TV. Use logical thinking.
I can’t respond to every moron. Sorry for singling you out.
You’re suggesting that everything on MSM is bs. You’re suggesting that news reporters were part of a conspiracy to, what? Hint or brag about controlled demolition?
Your short term memory is short. It wasn’t until Q+ took office that MSM distracted us completely on Trump vs not Trump.
Q has nothing to gain by telling the low IQ follower that there was no demolition.
If Q were to do so, there would be some combination of claiming it must be disinformation or that Q has been taken over by Mossad shills or whatever other delusional bubble would arise in the low IQ brain.
Sorry, but it’s true. Q isn’t going to comment on something long since disproven by a long long list of disinterested credible scientists and engineers. Anyone here that ‘knows for sure’ that WTC7 fell from controlled demolition isn’t a qualified scientist/engineer.
Your reaction is what happens when the little delusional bubble of yours combined with fragile ego about being wrong about something you were sure was right, is threatened. You’ll build up all sorts of delusions and attacks projected outward to defend that fragile ego. It’s ok, we’ve all been there. The smart ones are willing to be wrong, anon. It’s ok. It will be okay, anon.
Load pcap into wire shark and view the binary
You’re a butthurt anon with a belief in a disproven conspiracy theory that you’ll protect with ridiculous ad hominem attacks. There’s actual science on this. Stoop to silly childish attacks to defend the stupid conspiracy theory. You’re proving sociological theories right.
Anon, news was chaos that day. So you’re wrong. Sorry but you’re wrong. WTC7 caught fire, and fell from fires. I understand the need to cling to something you’ve believed for so long. You’ll be smarter if you ask yourself ‘what if WTC7 did actually fall from fires?’, investigate it yourself and draw your own conclusions.
If you still believe the controlled demolition theory then you probably have other issues for which we cannot help.
Your one sentence summary is the result of a biased incorrect conclusion. An intelligence analysis isn’t going to view facts as you’re doing. You’re not qualified. Sorry, anon. You’re not. Participation trophies are bullshit. You don’t get a trophy for claiming that you’ve uncovered some non existent coverup.
Sorry about this Q but you can see the extent of the issue with the whole ‘everything muh conspiracy’ mentality.
Top kek
Oh anon. Ad hominem to defend your absurd conspiracy theory.
Q now has a more Clearview (pardon the double entendre) on the low quality autists. Glad to have helped separate the wheat from the chaff
Anon, the penthouse fell inward due to key structural support collapsing first. Shell remained. It fell. It was fires.
Sorry but your conclusion is wrong. I admit to believing it for the first few years or at least I kept an open mind.
The NIST model is accurate. Fire codes were updated. The mob doesn’t control concrete anymore. There I said it.
If so then popular science, nist and others are all dumber than you are, or are part of some grand conspiracy.
Your anecdotes aren’t evidence of any controlled demo. Yes WTC7 caught fire. Yes the fire was out of control, took out a key support, led to the penthouse imploding (on video) before the building shell gave way.
You went the wrong way. Any other conspiracies aren’t tied to the controlled demolition conspiracy.
There’s zero direct credible evidence of controlled demolition, much less any evidence linking controlled demolition to any other conspiracy theories about who was behind 9:11
Also, keep in mind that analyzing WTC7’s collapse has absolutely no bearing on any other conspiracy theories. This seems to escape logical thinking
Yes I was devastated that day, I lived close by and saw fucking towelheads celebrating. No shit. But I studied this closely and the towers did fall from fires. Sorry you had to relive it anon.