Anonymous ID: 560d73 March 8, 2020, 8:23 p.m. No.8354020   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4063

8353660 pb

completely outed yourself as a shill

Haven't you figured out what happened to World Trade yet?

"My Aunt" really?

We need forensics not anecdotes.

Anecdotes only work on talk shows., like Oprah or Ellen.

You're doing a sophistry trick by mis-characterizing what I write.

>>8353805

Dude is in bad faith.

He says he embarrassed by us on the board then says it's only people who push trash ? Like what ?

"Popular Mechanics"

"The official version of 9/11"

"The notion Building 7 came down from a fire"

What opinions are moar trashy than any of that?

Alleged anon is dishonest.

No wonder he can't figure anything out.

Didn't do his homework yet thinks he can gaslight those who out performed him in the research dept.

Anonymous ID: 560d73 March 8, 2020, 8:30 p.m. No.8354088   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4129

>>8354025

fuck off cunt

Yes they are.

It IS that big.

The argument about how many people believe bullshit - is not an argument.

You are also weak in logic, aren't you?

You need to address the issues, not make empty appeals to authority.

figures

PERDUE.

Anonymous ID: 560d73 March 8, 2020, 8:33 p.m. No.8354117   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4155

>>8354025

Think about how the Media has made "the whole world" scorn POTUS Trump?

According to you, that shouldn't happen

"How could all those people be full of shit"?

Hey, I don't know. But they are.

Anonymous ID: 560d73 March 8, 2020, 8:40 p.m. No.8354170   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4194

>>8353820

So fascinating to me that they are still so concerned to place the geni back in the bottle over 9/11

We got some real retro arguments here. Thought I was back in '03

If the guys for real he's got A LOT of catching up to do.

I find it hard to believe he's a regular anon, as he appears to pretend.

Usually in the old days, about the time we get to where we are now, when the "debunker" is cornered. That's about the time we get banned.

I so happy to have 8 kun as useful for conversation.

Anonymous ID: 560d73 March 8, 2020, 8:58 p.m. No.8354290   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4341

>>8354194

fuck off pig

You are full of shit.

You are a shill and you are not in good faith.

This trick is old &called "fruit loop"

Ur are a lying sophist.

We've already proved it many times.

But you won't accept it because you are a liar and a fraud.

Repeating won't help because you are a fucking shill.

Read a few books on the subject?

It's not so rare to know the truth on this.|

Not anymoar.

oh no - —-

This isn't for me. This is for who you imagine is reading our interchange.

 

You know I know you are a fraud.

And I know you know I know it.

 

You just want to discredit me to casual readers who may not take the time to look closer.

 

The official findings don't need me to debunk them. They debunk themselves.

The book I linked to

it does it. no one has to repeat upon your slimy command. No one has to answer your questions nor to obey your ridiculous commands, you fucking fraud.

http://archive.is/qlnHW

Anonymous ID: 560d73 March 8, 2020, 9:08 p.m. No.8354350   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4367 >>4368

>>8354155

sorry to break it to you.

"Controlled demolition" of bld 7 is the least of the evidence against the official account of the attack.

You need to really study moar, just to be a descent shill.

Anonymous ID: 560d73 March 8, 2020, 9:24 p.m. No.8354450   🗄️.is 🔗kun

8354341

asking me to do his work for him again.

Starting to look like ebot.

 

Did ebot get mad at me for the anti - bernie things I wrote? And decided to fuck with me over this?

 

Check it out - "debunker - clown" has turned into e bot.

 

"Listen to the Mockingbird, stinging o'r his Grave"

>>8354414

Dude picks the most elementary issue to fight over. I remember from the beginning the shills fought like hell for every inch.

Now it's back to '03 - and they act like no one's done their homework.. Like it's still '03

ready for a rude awakening?

won't be a "great" one, but a rude one?

Anonymous ID: 560d73 March 8, 2020, 9:33 p.m. No.8354511   🗄️.is 🔗kun

8354368

dude is lying again.

Of course I pointed to what is false.

A building doesn't fall straight down to the ground when it's on fire.

kek.

I've studied this long and hard and this guy just cites "experts" - who are also lying.

Many examples of buildings on fire have been recorded since t 9/11 and before it.

None came down by fire

funny howj the C-A thinks they can make you believe ANYTHING no matter how crazy just by persistence, citing bogus authority and using sophistry - tricks of "logic"