Forests grow where hemp cannot

Meanwhile, the land that you wanted to grow hemp on

Can grow fruits, vegetables and grains

Not only that, but cattle can and do graze on free range

Among the trees planted on a tree farm in the mountains

And so the land also produces meat

And the manure fertilizes the trees

As for pulp, trees can be harvested every year as well

Either by thinning the crop to leave behind stronger trees to grow lumber

Or by harvesting clearcut strips which then get replanted.

That hemp crop cannot be grown on the same land every year

Or you will exhaust the micronutrients and produce lower grade hemp than the year before

In addition, pests will multiply until the weakened crops

End up being totally destroyed by the pests.

Fields are ecosystems and farmers are people who rotate crops

So none of the fields will produce hemp every year

Maybe one in 3 or one in 4.

City people who have no experience with nature

Make bad decisions when it comes to agriculture

Just as bad as having the Bilderbergs in Switzerland

Deciding what industries will be in the USA and what in China.

>>8353899

What a fool you are

Arguing technical details with anonymous people on 8kun

The people who know what happened on 9/11

Are the scientists and engineers who studied it in detail for years

None of them are here.

So, why are you talking about this again?

>>8353857

Many of us have seen controlled demolitions personally.

Often in a small or medium sized town this is announced as a spectator event weeks in advance

People crowd the windows of nearby high buildings on a Sunday afternoon to watch

And when we say WTC7 come down we knew immediately that it was no accident

No fires or whatever

But controlled demolition just like we saw before.

I'm not interested in any videos that say otherwise.

I might read a formal report, but I'll check who wrote it first, and if it is not scientists and or building engineers, then I'll likely skip it.

I did read the 911 commission report, and the Challenger disaster report and some others.

I find that people who point to videos as evidence are usually (maybe 90% of the time) just shills.

>>8353929

A natural woman.

Looks like she would be fun to play with.

Sorry that she offends you pedophiles

And sorry that you haven't yet accepted that you actually are a pedophile

Because pedophiles are people who LOVE the idea of sex with underage people

Not just those who actually do it

When your legal age partner has to simulate being underage

For you to have sex with them

THEN YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE

>>8353945

Fur like that is so soft and silky

Smells good too.

First I thought that the SEVEN were the 7 creative agencies who control Hollywood

Then I thought, that the well known 6 companies controlling MSM

Were really 7 because nobody was counting Gannett/Tegna,

The source of the 4am talking points

But then I thought

Nobody really refers to them as HOUSES

But these last guys, use that term

And what do you know!!??

There seem to be 7 baddies as well.

And one of them was locked out of their castle the other day

For a while at least

A signal?

I know where I will be looking tomorrow

Because I believe that the families controlling the World Jewish Congress

Are really relatives of the Danish, Swedish and Norwegian royals.

And maybe there are some other ones there as well.

These fit the bill for being the men behind the curtain

Letting their minions take all the flak.

>>8354100

Women who bathe regularly

Do not stink.

The presence of hair makes no difference

>>8354384

>>8354148

The theory that it is the 7 Royal Houses of Europe who are going down this week

Fits with the DefenderEurope exercise that the Army tweets about

Down with Monarchy!!!

They are the Cabal leaders