>>8355570 ty for the graphic, didn't have that one.

Yes, a special kind of highly resonant device, 'tuned' to ring the bell of the building sections, vibrating them so quickly and with such force, they melted and dissociated.

The role of the nano-thermite causing the many 'booms' just prior to the main nuclear EM pulse, served to "chop" the building into sections, such that the primary pulse wasn't damped by the overall stucture, but rather 'rang' each decoupled section as it moved to free-fall, dustifying it on the way down.

It was also likely a "shaped charge". These 'tactical nukes' make have been designed to work top-down vs bottom-up for their more anticipated use in an attack scenario within theatre operations, or could have been engineered more specifically for such an application as we witnessed that day.

>>8355724

>The role of the nano-thermite causing the many 'booms' just prior to the main nuclear EM pulse, served to "chop" the building into sections, such that the primary pulse wasn't damped by the overall stucture, but rather 'rang' each decoupled section as it moved to free-fall, dustifying it on the way down.

Serving to clear/expand the elevator shaft first is also likely, as shown in the graphic. Can't be sure.

I think the attribution of the iron dust to thermitic reactions, from the rebar and other metal in the building, is grossly misplaced. A percentage perhaps, but not the bulk.

That it was some sort of nuclear device is quite evident, during and after the event.

>>8355735

Yes, have been tracking that for years. Likely why the victim funds have been voted to be 'extended' in recent years.

>>8355744

Good advice, a rule in the house.