Anonymous ID: 0d5da8 March 10, 2020, 4:41 p.m. No.8371671   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8365429

>>8365429

 

>>8365456

>>8365456

 

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.02511.pdf

 

V. CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a characterisation of deterministic

processes in the presence of CTCs for an arbitrary number of localised regions. Our proofs have demonstrated

that non-trivial time travel between multiple regions is

consistent with the absence of a logical paradox as long

as once the outputs of all but two regions are fixed, at

most one-way signalling is possible.

The most significant result of our work is our discovery of distinct non-trivial quadripartite process functions

which are compatible with the presence of CTCs. This

demonstrates that when multiple local regions communicate with each other in the presence of CTCs, there is a

broad range of communication scenarios which still allow

freedom of choice for observers in each region without the

development of a logical inconsistency such as a grand father paradox. The range of distinct communication scenarios which are consistent with the presence of CTCs

proves that the way CTCs allow multiple observers in distinct regions to communicate is not incredibly restricted

by a conflict with locality, free will and logical inconsistencies. As a result, we have demonstrated that there is

a range of scenarios in which multiple observers can communicate without causal order in a classical framework.

Anonymous ID: 0d5da8 March 10, 2020, 4:46 p.m. No.8371712   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8371686

>>8371701

 

V. CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a characterisation of deterministic

processes in the presence of CTCs for an arbitrary number of localised regions. Our proofs have demonstrated

that non-trivial time travel between multiple regions is

consistent with the absence of a logical paradox as long

as once the outputs of all but two regions are fixed, at

most one-way signalling is possible.

The most significant result of our work is our discovery of distinct non-trivial quadripartite process functions

which are compatible with the presence of CTCs. This

demonstrates that when multiple local regions communicate with each other in the presence of CTCs, there is a

broad range of communication scenarios which still allow

freedom of choice for observers in each region without the

development of a logical inconsistency such as a grand father paradox. The range of distinct communication scenarios which are consistent with the presence of CTCs

proves that the way CTCs allow multiple observers in distinct regions to communicate is not incredibly restricted

by a conflict with locality, free will and logical inconsistencies. As a result, we have demonstrated that there is

a range of scenarios in which multiple observers can communicate without causal order in a classical framework.

 

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.02511.pdf

Anonymous ID: 0d5da8 March 10, 2020, 5:04 p.m. No.8371854   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Michael Osterholm is an internationally recognized expert in infectious disease epidemiology. He is Regents Professor, McKnight Presidential Endowed Chair in Public Health, the director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP), Distinguished Teaching Professor in the Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, a professor in the Technological Leadership Institute, College of Science and Engineering, and an adjunct professor in the Medical School, all at the University of Minnesota. Look for his book "Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Deadly Germs" for more info. https://amzn.to/2IAzeLe

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3URhJx0NSw