>>8378973

It's because you laid it on too thick. You can't just come at it like "GUYS! There's a massive military op going on right now!"

Of course it's going to sound tinfoil when you jump straight to it like that. You have to give them little bits of truth that they can digest.

They're called red PILLS for a reason. They kick in gradually.

Not to mention that some medicine you have to increase the dosage gradually over time.

Just think about it from the perspective of a 100% blue-pilled normie.

"You mean they're lying to me about a global pandemic because the military is actually sweeping up 'bad guys'? Gee… they always told me Trump would eventually go military dictator on his political enemies…"

(I didn't even consider the angle that the 100% normies might even think Trump is going military dictator, until I had typed it through. This is why you can't skip the many necessary redpill stages in between.)

This is probably why Q started this ball rolling 2 and a half years ago: To give this redpill process a chance to unfold. 4-6% will be lost to the MSM narrative, but I'll bet quite a few people than we realize are sufficiently redpilled, but just don't talk about it.

>>8379189

When making a claim of fact, stick to what you can prove.

When trying to persuade about the possibility or impossibility of something, point to precedent and trends.

For example:

I can't prove that the Earth WON'T end in 8 years as Bernie stated today.

What I CAN do is point to fear-mongering stories by trusted mainstream media sources:

https://apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

The idea is to get people to want to go and learn more. Things like this will get at least a few noggins joggin.

"Hey, you know, that's right… they really HAVE been trying to get people wound up about this climate change thing….."