Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 9 a.m. No.83962   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3970 >>3974

>>83926

Thabnks. I am looking through my Caps to narrow down and post the log with the kid talking about him, his friend, and why they threw those up. I had discussion directly with them. When did we move exactly again from 4chan? That would help me narrow it down. I could go back through the meganon posts thread at reddit, but I'm not a reddit fan at all.

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 9:29 a.m. No.84057   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4060

>>84036

This is a connundrum. And do not feed the trolls comes to mind. To respond safely, you have t do it with a throw away or risk walking into a trap that will get you harassed. They know this of course. Throw aways are easily then claimed as Russian bot farm. Fuck that clown. Let it go. We know who we are. And do not give him traffic.

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 9:56 a.m. No.84157   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4198 >>4207

>>84147

Wikipedia is not a guys. Wikipedia is the premise that someone will make an entry and it will be verified by the community. Lots of bullshit rolls through Wiki. It is an interesting starting point, but should always be cross verified. Imagine it as trying to give people bite sized pieces of something and a starting point. Moderators still have a heavy hand there and I have found lots of slants, and errors. It is why it is not allowed to be a citable source in most school work.

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 10:24 a.m. No.84271   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>84160

Until someone can pull together enough photo imagery from 360 degrees around that event, we cannot say that it goes straight up and down. 2D visual imagery is insufficient. What looks flat from one angle could indeed still be an angle from another. Not going to bother with graphics to drive it home. we should all know this by now. If this is anyone's baby, pull it all together and see what you can make of it without bias. Don't need to start blue beaming everyone accidentally. It's not my bag, but I'd be interested in a full factual analysis.

I'm working a follow the money line to show people why the media does what it does with bias, tied to the dollar, and garnering and trying to keep market share in today's obsessive society, based on person bias and tapping into cognitive dissonance. They aren't just out right being paid by Soros to be flakey left wing. Yeah, some of them are, probably, but in the end, it's all about the money. Fox saw that there was a segment that wasn't biting the poisoned apple and ran with it, to a degree. They still help shape a narrative though and the complexities of shareholder pressure, ad revenue, and viewership is always at their forefront.

The now exceedingly popular finger pointing is getting tiresome. They spend more time talking about what someone else says about something, driving that us and them story line, than the facts of an issue. I think alot of this is because people have not been taught to digest facts, but instead feelings. I am on a stop manipulating me rant today.

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 10:35 a.m. No.84319   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4332 >>4370 >>4408

>>84281

I am and have been. She is not. George Webb went off on that whole Q is Bannon thing. The only thing she might be guilty of doing is falling into a trap of eliminating Bannon based on evidence and that would make it potentially easier for someone else to work out who it might be. Everyone has to expect these debates to happen. We are here, basically putting our faith in an unknown source of information and that is โ€ฆ interesting. Many people wouldn't trust it, and knowing who is feeding you something is important to them.

No one likes their faith manipulated. that's a 4000 year old ploy. Just let them go about their business. The discussion is good in some ways and there is no fear of Q being doxxed by Webb.

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 10:41 a.m. No.84357   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>84345

Also false. wrong Paddock. stop spreading shit that makes us look stupid, unless that's what you are being paid to do. Get your facts straight.

Back up all arguments with verifiable facts for legitimacy. Don't get conned.

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 10:46 a.m. No.84385   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4418

>>84152

Then all I have on that is good. That's their job. Nice to know we are getting our tax dollars worth.

I get that you are looking for patterns that indicate they know something we don't out here yet. Do your thing. there is always a balance between passing knowledge and panic mode though. It's like that TV show (not that good) that was onl earlier in the season on ABC. Where an Elon Musk type was building an ark because the planet killer was coming and none of the governments wanted people to know because of the ensuing panic. That argument of do they know what's best for us, blah blah. They were racing for a solution and there were still politics and hatred between us and of course the Russians. This whole meteor conversation today is straight out of the plot lines.

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 10:49 a.m. No.84397   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>84388

WSJ did a piece yesterday trying to sully it up saying they could never get her personal confirmation and that the NDA was signed and she stopped talking but talked BEFORE itโ€ฆ Fucking faggots. All unverifiable and it's why they never ran the story. WTF ever.

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 10:57 a.m. No.84429   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4553

>>84368

Completely agree. They shamed us into not being able to be "color blind." and keep pressing identity politics to make us angry ar leach other and weak as fractured parts of a whole. We need to work on the pull together, not the pull apart.

There will always be things we disagree on, of course.

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 11:01 a.m. No.84457   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4522 >>4531

>>84426

That will not be done. the 21st amendment is there for a reason. It is not for us to "shut them down" only expose their lies and either get with the program or fade into obscurity. Why is that people always want to counter what they hate, with WHAT THEY hate and rationalize it?

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 11:37 a.m. No.84654   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4657

>>84591

I'm an asshole. I admit it. I feel they are condescending. And I dislike anything that puts words in peoples' mouths. Go find real people that say that and run hard with it.

Or turn around and ask it as a question, so that people cannot accuse you of propaganda yourself.

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 11:39 a.m. No.84664   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4679

>>84648

What they do with it is their business as a company. No one said they had to give bonuses or redistribute. And you cannot define the future. Unless you have researched their plans for expansion or upgrades or what not, all you are doing is judging them prematurely.

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 11:43 a.m. No.84685   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>84672

News has become Big money. Politcal news is the hotest topic as it is the most divisive. They make money off people hating Trump and feed the anger. They keep it titillating and extreme because that's what brings in the dough, and how they justify a 24 hour news presence in the age of the internet.

Anonymous ID: 517b86 Jan. 18, 2018, 11:50 a.m. No.84735   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>84707

You know, with all of this garbageโ€ฆ Do you know what you don't get? You never get someone coming on, screaming they were Q and they were compromised and don't believe them, believe me!!! The logic jumps these people are making to justify their beliefs at times just astounds me.