Precisely. Many on this board aren't using their heads. What is the relevance of Austin's story being authentic? If a "Q imposter" is gaining enough attention (and growing) that mainstream journalists are requesting interviews for hit pieces, should we not be vigilant? If Austin was a spook, is that not relevant?
We should be watching all of the pieces, anons. We cannot be so arrogant to believe we'll know what and how they come into play.
>>>8400061
Serious questions though. He's now claimed to be a DIA agent, threatened a Queen, and just today posted Terry Bradshaw's medical records on Youtube.
For those who say "His demeanor tells you all you need to know", it really doesn't at all.
He's gained over 10k followers this last week alone, and his videos are now getting 10's of thousands of views.
Have authorities just not seen this yet? How long will he be allowed to post such content? Is he presenting in a way that it is technically not illegal? If he is not Q, and he continues to post things that are not legal—without removal or consequences—how? Who is he with and what is the agenda?
Really, would you like those other pesky questions from each day of the week?
Have any of the questions supported Austin being authentic?
Who is he—and what is the agenda? If he's a shill—post such evidence and spread now. It will be helpful in the event of future media shill stories of "anarchist Q hackers posting private medical records."