>>8400118 (pb)
Well, I think the implication was that they WERE making a recommendation. You had to turn it around in a pompous manner to somehow allow them "to concur" (is that the term you'd use?).
>>8400118 (pb)
Well, I think the implication was that they WERE making a recommendation. You had to turn it around in a pompous manner to somehow allow them "to concur" (is that the term you'd use?).
>>8400445 (pb)
Funny how Hanx and Wifey got diagnosed way before other people in Oz. How did we have testing facilities here ahead of the USA?
Hey kiddies, guess what daddy's been doing.
We'll tell you when you're a bit older . . . .
Reeking Beaver - what are you doing???