If you couldn't buy a firearm until you were 21 would that mean that you would have to be 21 to join the military?
Would Selective Service then require citizens to register at age 21?
Can a military win a war without soldiers who are under 21?
If you couldn't buy a firearm until you were 21 would that mean that you would have to be 21 to join the military?
Would Selective Service then require citizens to register at age 21?
Can a military win a war without soldiers who are under 21?
Peterson sees the incremental legal and social evolution of the Ontario Human Rights tribunal as a prime example of Wynne’s radical leftist ideology put into practice, noting that under her tenure as Canadian Premier, the presumption of innocence until proven guilty has been entirely lost, not unlike the U.K.’s recent move toward criminalizing contempt.
“We’re replacing that with ‘believe the accused’ and ‘preponderance of evidence’ and it’s part of the assault on English common law, which is regarded by the postmodern, neomarxists as just another narrative, and part of the patriarchal tyranny,” he said.
When asked if he had any political aspirations, he responded that while he believes he has more to offer assessing politics through a psychological lens, he may indeed run against Trudeau in the next election if Canada continues down its present path.
https:// squawker.org/politics/jordan-peterson-is-considering-a-run-for-prime-minister-against-justin-trudeau/
https:// squawker.org/politics/jordan-peterson-is-considering-a-run-for-prime-minister-against-justin-trudeau/
You DO NOT apologize to totalitarianism.
It will only chew you up and spit you out if you do.
Whoever is advising Laura is a dumbass.
Or, she is a dumbass.
Did she never consider that she might obtain loyal sponsors by saying what she means and meaning what she says?
I hope everybody can see we are heading to Coke good Pepsi bad or vice versa depending on your political point of view.
TRUST SESSIONS
If you one is for limited government and empowerment of the individual I generally support them.
If not, I could care less what label they give themselves.
He is a weapon with an agenda.
His agenda was to imply that Bannon (Trump) stole the election while attempting to deflect attention on Zuckerberg/Farcebook.
However, the gambit backfired and anons, and others, dug into what his company actually did.
He is a famefag that was virtue signaling. He had his moment in the sun and it will destroy him.
I do not. I read his long piece when it came out. It was obvious what he was doing.
https:// www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign.html