>>8423667
Sorry - satire possible, like this link https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/gesellschaft/2019/12/13/keine-belege-dass-christine-lagarde-gesagt-hat-alte-menschen-wuerden-zu-lange - suggests life.
But in 1998 such a thought of "socially acceptable death" was already considered. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sozialvertr%C3%A4gliches_Fr%C3%BChableben
Link translated with Google:
Socially acceptable early death was the catchword in 1998 in Germany. At that time, further savings planned led to reductions in benefits and quality, which had also become old in their last decade, when most of the benefits of the health solidarity community became necessary.
Bremen surgeon and chamber president Karsten Vilmar used the term in a radio interview with the NDR. The topic was the health policy of the red-green federal government, which planned further savings to limit rising costs.
Changed payment systems reduced z. B. considerably the lay times and the number of hospitals. The early discharge shifts costs into the temporary follow-up treatment and shortens them to the disadvantage of the sick.
Vilmar said literally, "Then the patients have to be satisfied with less performance and we have to consider whether this persistence can persist or whether we have to promote socially acceptable early life." When asked whether the government's plans for an earlier death Vilmar said: "If this reform continues, it will be the inevitable result."
There was great outrage at the use of this term. While some saw irony in Vilmar's testimony, others saw a cynical concept and considered it inappropriate in memory of the National Socialist homicides.
Annotation:
The constant attempt to raise the retirement age of the population would fit in as described in the "possible fake article".