>>842554 If the same 1918 chess position is in play now, then methinks Assange is about to come into play.
>>842795 Yes, Assange put out the chess position on 1/12/18. I know because I was in bed and didn't see it until the morning of the 13th, when I saw it and it was an instant autist grok. Was very surprised that no one had said Assange was the rook. I had no idea it was Marshall/Capablanca until later—thought it was a composed chess problem. Whether that is the correct analysis remains to be seen. But the fact is that Assange wasn't just putting it out there for kicks, to see who could first say 1918. He meant something else entirely.
>>843073 No idea what he is up to. And as far as he or any other player goes, it is impossible for me to accept their public statements any more without thoughtful scrutiny. Anyone could be running those accounts.
>>843286 For sure "they" are not our friends. Neither for or against Sitchin (deceased), but did read all his work. Wrote him once and asked why the Neffies would ever have left. He replied and said, "I have never said that they left."