,=,e
,=,e
stochastic dark humor
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
what kind of loser needlessly writes such tepid myopia
,=,e
,=,e
that's your homo denial talking
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
pixelated
digitized
jewfaghams
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
virtual tower of gaylord babel spams
soliloQuy
,=,e
solipsism
,=,e
Probability calculus
Modus ponens represents an instance of the Law of total probability which for a binary variable is expressed as:
{\displaystyle \Pr(Q)=\Pr(Q\mid P)\Pr(P)+\Pr(Q\mid \lnot P)\Pr(\lnot P)\,}{\displaystyle \Pr(Q)=\Pr(Q\mid P)\Pr(P)+\Pr(Q\mid \lnot P)\Pr(\lnot P)\,},
where e.g. {\displaystyle \Pr(Q)}{\displaystyle \Pr(Q)} denotes the probability of {\displaystyle Q}Q and the conditional probability {\displaystyle \Pr(Q\mid P)}{\displaystyle \Pr(Q\mid P)} generalizes the logical implication {\displaystyle P\to Q}P\to Q. Assume that {\displaystyle \Pr(Q)=1}{\displaystyle \Pr(Q)=1} is equivalent to {\displaystyle Q}Q being TRUE, and that {\displaystyle \Pr(Q)=0}{\displaystyle \Pr(Q)=0} is equivalent to {\displaystyle Q}Q being FALSE. It is then easy to see that {\displaystyle \Pr(Q)=1}{\displaystyle \Pr(Q)=1} when {\displaystyle \Pr(Q\mid P)=1}{\displaystyle \Pr(Q\mid P)=1} and {\displaystyle \Pr(P)=1}{\displaystyle \Pr(P)=1}. Hence, the law of total probability represents a generalization of modus ponens [11].
Subjective logic
Modus ponens represents an instance of the binomial deduction operator in subjective logic expressed as:
{\displaystyle \omega {Q\|P}^{A}=(\omega {Q|P}^{A},\omega {Q|\lnot P}^{A})\circledcirc \omega {P}^{A}\,}{\displaystyle \omega {Q\|P}^{A}=(\omega {Q|P}^{A},\omega {Q|\lnot P}^{A})\circledcirc \omega {P}^{A}\,},
where {\displaystyle \omega {P}^{A}}{\displaystyle \omega {P}^{A}} denotes the subjective opinion about {\displaystyle P}P as expressed by source {\displaystyle A}A, and the conditional opinion {\displaystyle \omega {Q|P}^{A}}{\displaystyle \omega {Q|P}^{A}} generalizes the logical implication {\displaystyle P\to Q}P\to Q. The deduced marginal opinion about {\displaystyle Q}Q is denoted by {\displaystyle \omega {Q\|P}^{A}}{\displaystyle \omega {Q\|P}^{A}}. The case where {\displaystyle \omega {P}^{A}}{\displaystyle \omega {P}^{A}} is an absolute TRUE opinion about {\displaystyle P}P is equivalent to source {\displaystyle A}A saying that {\displaystyle P}P is TRUE, and the case where {\displaystyle \omega {P}^{A}}{\displaystyle \omega {P}^{A}} is an absolute FALSE opinion about {\displaystyle P}P is equivalent to source {\displaystyle A}A saying that {\displaystyle P}P is FALSE. The deduction operator {\displaystyle \circledcirc }{\displaystyle \circledcirc } of subjective logic produces an absolute TRUE deduced opinion {\displaystyle \omega {Q\|P}^{A}}{\displaystyle \omega {Q\|P}^{A}} when the conditional opinion {\displaystyle \omega {Q|P}^{A}}{\displaystyle \omega {Q|P}^{A}} is absolute TRUE and the antecedent opinion {\displaystyle \omega {P}^{A}}{\displaystyle \omega {P}^{A}} is absolute TRUE. Hence, subjective logic deduction represents a generalization of both modus ponens and the Law of total probability [12].
what if we put the new temple down the road from mordor
Modus ponendo tollens (MPT;[1] Latin: "mode that denies by affirming")[2] is a valid rule of inference for propositional logic. It is closely related to modus ponens and modus tollendo ponens.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunctive_syllogism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_tollendo_ponens
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e
,=,e