>>8433754 (pb)
Nice notable here…
Oct 4 is date for "Anons ready?" "Memes ready?"
Also Scavino tweeted flag at 23:40.. Q2340 same date
Q posted a meme CLEARLY suggesting that Scavino is Q.
Anons think.
You're a shill.
Steal the petty cash and run.
Hookers are probably desperate 2nite. Get yourself a $5 blowjob.
The VIPanon thing was HUGE. Q2347.
POTUS basically ANSWERED THE Q.
But the MSM didn't pic this up. Why?
Why didn't they "accuse" him of fostering "baseless conspiracy theories"?
Maybe we need to decisively dox Q to PROVE that the MSM has been lying all along, and maybe Q is giving us the clues on this.
Obviously, could be wrong. But IF this is what Q is directing us to do (and I think we should examine that) then we should consider how to DO it…
That's a random post from the board.
If Q is giving us directives to dox Q, in order to DESTROY the MSM, then we should do that.
And we sure as fuck should CONSIDER whether Q is directing us to do that. And POTUS too…. POTUS posted that violin meme and that was an OBVIOUS Q comm.
Dan Scavino is a real person who is OBVIOUSLY giving Q comms.
And POTUS is OBVIOUSLY endorsing them.
BOTH of those facts are obvious to any anon paying attention.
What that really "means"… maybe that is more complex… but shills who jump in and say "we don't dox Q wa wa wa" are trying to mislead anons.
All of this is very complex but maybe sorting this out is what we need to do.
No MORAN.
The Q drop says they are WAITING for it… but it doesn't say it will happen.
Maybe the MSM is all TOTALLY COMPED. Isn't that pretty much what most anons believe? I do!
What does it really meant when Q says they may have to FORCE it?
Good Q anon…
So much disinfo since the enemy also reads comms…
I do think that Scavino provide obvious Q comms that POTUS endorses….
Does that mean DS is Q? Not sure.
But I do suspect this is something we are being directed to examine. That violin meme was SO obvious that the fake news HAD to comment…. but they "faked" it and didn't ask the obvious question of whether the whole "show" was directed by the WH. Maybe looking at these issues can PROVE their total fuckery…
SOLID point anon…
I think that is pointing to the idea that we SHOULD examine this issue….
My thinking is that maybe this is an angle to SCREW the MSM which always lies…
FULL RESPECT to those anons who believe we should "not dox Q"… that is my default position too… but it seems to me that they are multiple comms that point in the opposite direction.
MAYBE "doxxing Q" is part of the plan to show how the MSM systematically lies…
Think about it… does this whole op HINGE on supposing that some evil operative won't "figure it out"? Or maybe it plays to their weakness? Maybe they will think they really "got it"… and screwed us… but maybe they really got played…
LURK MOAR.