Question for tax/finance anons:
Would strong volatility in the market help make up for lost tax revenue from other sources?
Gotta have a better argument than that. All easily dismissed many many times already. I'm not going to rehash it here.
Maybe…maybe not.
Blockchain is comped, if anything. The only use for it would be something like Bitcoin. There are better protocols like PARSEC for distributed computing or storage. Shitcoiner? Yeah, don't stray too much.
Idiot. Where did I argue for Bitcoin as backing any money?
Any what does the constitution actually say about gold and silver?
Stop being an idiot with this strawman shit before you out yourself as a lefty plant.
POTUS likes innovation. Enough said. Why stymie it? It can exist without threatening the constitution…
I'm just saying that if it grows and becomes successful, then silver will have a tough time. Silver has already lost the theoretical battle between math based commodities. That doesn't give it zero value by any means nor does it remove the importance of gold. Shit evolves. Get with it.
That's all true except the intrinsic value part. Is love valueable? God? Meaning? Virtue? Truth?
What about math? Is math that can't be manipulated or confiscated valueable? This is abstract shit, I know, but for those that really want to give debate a chance, this is what that camp is arguing…and proving.
One of the sticking points for many is that being a new innovation, like all new innovations, there is a lot of scamming. So, again, have innovations changed human history. Fuck yeah. Is the future now static just because we like certain things or fail to understand more complex things? Time will tell…
I'm trying to engage in open debate rather than shutting people down with strawmen and names. Who's the real clown here?