>>8440236

If it's only old people who are getting sick and dying, why aren't the old people getting isolated where they can't get the germs?

All the Presidential candidates are in their 70s. Making the world save for the oldest is really expensive, and harmful to the economy.

We should be thinking of different ways to get the old people away from the germs. Closing everything down is not the way to go. Getting the risky old people away from germs by keeping them away from other people will work better.

The boomers are getting old now, and they're what, going to close everything down that they don't do much anymore because people they might come in contact with might've gotten CoV from one of those places that they used to go to.

Figure out the way to keep the old people, the most at risk, away from the germs. Let everyone else just do what they do. Otherwise, see DJIA.

Free food / grocery delivery for old people. Keeps them out of the supermarkets.

Where would be the worst place for an old person that isn't one of the places that is often closed? Can you close the supermarket? Can you ban people over a certain age from it?

I don't think you want to do that.

But if everyone over a certain age can have grocery delivery for free, that should keep them out of the supermarkets.

>>8440423

Ah, that could work. Whichever is cheapest. And old people seem to like to get up early.

Shutting everything down isn't the right way to go, it isn't sustainable, and really, this virus is unique is that it's in a Presidential Year when all the candidates are in their 70s.

The problem isn't this virus, it's old people getting sick and dying from this virus. I'm not seeing any real indication that this particular virus is so much worse than any of the other viruses. Why now? It's like all the cadidates are fighting over the old lady vote, screw the economy, screw all the workers losing money. Are the old people even aware that this is all about them? Aren't there young people who carry this without symptoms?