>>844096 (last bread)

>No we gotta make sure we hit the minimum of 50 fucking threads daily so anons do whatever it takes including engaging phwat earfferz n Christcunts so we can slide any fucking pertinent information found

So, I take it you're a baker? Last I checked, the interwebs still have plenty of space available.

>>844704

I'm all for not saying her (yes, her) name at all, haven't for weeks. I'm almost kicking myself for even replying, except for the fact that you're 100% correct. Those who want to counter her, I won't try to stop, I'd rather look into something more worthwhile though, than that obvious psyop

>>845140

KEK

(the ONLY way to respond to those types, logic will not register)