>>8451023

anon, another baker here.

it would help A LOT with analytical posts like this if the poster would would

summarize the main point

at the top.

Baker cannot read thru a long analysis with diffuse ideas.

If poster does not summarize,

then nommer should try.

If you can nom it, you can summarize the main idea, right?

cc: >>8451063

>>8451463

>>8451463

sorry meant for

>>8451024

>>8451599

thanks anon.

toughest thing for bakers, these anon analyses that are long and somewhat rambling. requires a back and forth–and even then, often the poster has trouble stating a main point.