Go home, Snake.
You're drunk…
>This would make portions of the atmosphere very tenuous, and may result in flash freezing like we see with mammoths that have un-degested flowers in their stomachs
I know what you're thinking, but there's a problem with your analysis. Or "science's". Or both.
According to "data" (which can be misinterpreted, rather easily), the last pole flip happened roughly 780,000 years ago. According to moar "data", those mammoths likely died off roughly 12,000 years ago or so.
Technically, I don't believe that either date is correct. But, it just goes to show how absolutely ignorant we are to these types of things.
>Everything in the universe has been running down since the universe began.
>
>There is no evidence for a magnetic pole swap.
There is less evidence that the Universe "began"
>I'm open to scrapping a lot of theories, but my experiences and research point me towards the idea of cyclical recurring resets/cataclysmic events based on galactic rotation.
I'm more open to the concept of cycles than the last time we talked. Still, I'm not convinced. Especially on long term cycles. I try to stay open to theories, mainly because I feel like no one on the planet has a definite understanding of what really happened.
I understand that these could potentially be caused by frequencies emanating from the galactic center. But those really don't necessarily fit in with the one time events like Scholl's star grazing this system. Or the Earth capturing the moon. I'm pretty sure that's a one time thing. Although, I am aware that fluctuations in our solar (or even galactic) circuit could affect our relationship with our celestial satellite. But it would seem that the initial locking of the two bodies (Earth & Moon) would be the most devastating to endure. Which, to the best of my knowledge, would likely be a one time event, thus not really anything that can be considered cyclical.