Anonymous ID: 99264d March 17, 2020, 11:48 p.m. No.8459623   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>9856

>>8459499

>Example of a number of Twitter patriots (including Q followers) not fully understanding what Q+ are doing.

POTUS is breaking the mother fucking bank. And they begged him to do it too.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHASAHHAAHHAHASAHAHHAHAHHA

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 17, 2020, 11:52 p.m. No.8459641   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>8459563

> The people on twatter who ran with this made the truth movement look bad.

Yes. It wouldn't surprise me if they were set up. Milts got his Discord parked here trying to push a constant stream of this type of bullshit.

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 17, 2020, 11:55 p.m. No.8459661   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>8459529

>Nigga you ain’t been watching any TV I guess. Fox has had multiple interviews

Yep. Also, if I had a family member die from this, the LAST thing I'd do is talk to reporters. Fucking vultures. Looks like the 4 shills of the Viropcalypse were unhappy with you pointing it out.

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 18, 2020, 12:04 a.m. No.8459707   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>9726 >>9778 >>9881

>>8459537

>But if this whole shebang is The Storm rolling in, then we're about to fucking END THE GOD DAMNING FED.

The Fed decided to reopen the abomindible PDCF(Primary Dealer Credit Facility). First used in 2008 to allow the Primary Dealers that own the Fed, to dump bidless MBS, CMBS, CDS and other clumps of used toilet paper at par for freshly printed FRNs, the New and Improved PDCF will now also take Stocks as collateral.

The Fed's on it's way to destroy itself.

Now POTUS is going to make it puke out a Trillion or two on top of this.

Fucking glorious.

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 18, 2020, 12:09 a.m. No.8459738   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>9745 >>9797

>>8459541

>THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES. Is Kek or Q trying to tell us it was Soros behind Coronavirus from Wuhan?

 

No Q most certainly is not. Why are you pushing this?

This is not the BioWeapons Lab.

It's a pharmaceutical company.

This is the lab, for the 6th time

http://english.whiov.cas.cn/

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 18, 2020, 12:14 a.m. No.8459779   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>9824

>>8459634

>SAUCE ANONS PROOF OF SOROS INVESTMENT IN 666 ADDY

>>8459634

Scream all you want about Wuxi PharmaTech.

The Wuhan lab is here

Address: Xiao Hong Shan No.44, Wuhan, P.R.China.

Postcode: 430071

Tel: 027-87198593γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€

Fax: 027-87198209γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€

E-mail: wiv@wh.iov.cn

http://english.whiov.cas.cn/About_Us2016/Contact2016/

Nigger

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 18, 2020, 12:15 a.m. No.8459784   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>8459667

>now can you show that this is the same address as the level 4 containment facility?

>

>what is its name?

Wuhan Institute of Virology

http://english.whiov.cas.cn/About_Us2016/Contact2016/

Address: Xiao Hong Shan No.44, Wuhan, P.R.China.

Postcode: 430071

Tel: 027-87198593γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€

Fax: 027-87198209γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€γ€€

E-mail: wiv@wh.iov.cn

No relation to WuXi

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 18, 2020, 12:17 a.m. No.8459788   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>9856

>>8459601

>You read Chinese? I can’t believe I clicked that shit, have to scan my computer now.

How stupid are you?

http://english.whiov.cas.cn/

See that … the first word is ENGLISH shit for brains.

Wow you guys aint pushing WuXi to help the cause. Bunch of shills

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 18, 2020, 12:22 a.m. No.8459810   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>9817

>>8459728

>The Y is a chemical bond, which conveniently makes a triangle, but gives the ears you guys see in the Andrenochrome structure.

>

DERP. Muh High Skewl chemistry Muh

There's no Iron (FE) in adrenochrome. It's easy to look up. These niggers been pushing this shit for two days now.

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 18, 2020, 12:24 a.m. No.8459822   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>9851

>>8459809

>show the doc and why it's a different wuxi.

>

>even gy shift is busy these days!

It's not a different WuXi.

But you know that.

It's the Wuhan Institute for Virology.

I've blasted it all thread. Your stupid argument is stupid.

Take care "baker"

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 18, 2020, 12:38 a.m. No.8459906   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>9926

>>8459880

Your running the op with these niggers convincing anons WuXi is the Bio Weapons Lab.

I don't want a fucking notable.

I posted a cap of who they are.

Your just as dishonest as a Cabal review board. Post their shit in Notables. Damage our rep some more. That's the point of this OP anyway, isnt it.

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 18, 2020, 12:53 a.m. No.8459972   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>0019

>>8459946

I'm fine with that, Bakes.

I'm also NOT saying Soros isn't involved with WuXi. It looks like he has an investment there, though he doesn't "own" it. Like any public company, he owns stock.

Also NOT saying anything about WuXi wrt shit they may be stirring up. We know China is threatening cutting off pharm products, and this a Phar Product producer.

All I am saying is, WuXi was founded in 2000.

Wuhan Institute was founded by Mao in 1956 and is a part of the University. It is entirely state owned.

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 18, 2020, 1:12 a.m. No.8460059   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>0069

>>8459981

>not exactly a diplomatic, is he?

I was unaware that was a criteria.

Please give my regards to the filtering snowflake. I was unaware that anons were offended that POTUS activating the plan to take down the FED was so offensive.

Y'all are funny.

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 18, 2020, 1:22 a.m. No.8460096   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>8460029

>Important info on coronavirus immunity

S and L strain info is a bit dated. May be in notables already.

Using S type to defeat L type.

But ChiComs still telling us lock down stopped it.

It's plausible. I read someting about this from a Taiwan research site. Gotta be sauce available.

Anonymous ID: 99264d March 18, 2020, 1:31 a.m. No.8460138   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>0164

>>8460069

>anons seldom that offended

>

>but all of us look at an anon's posts if there's a controversy

Precisely where was I offended?

There are controversies on this board as soon as Baker Girls hit over tats and fake tits. If I did, I'd never get anything done.

I have made reasonable arguments, while being attacked by 4 other anons, who, in a totalitarian manner, took it very angrily that I was pointing out what I did. That's not how people research, and it's certainly not the way forward. REEEEEing cuz you WANT your digs to prove something, but don't quite get there, is hardly diplomatic, is it?

>don't you?