Anonymous ID: 02d2d6 March 18, 2020, 5:01 p.m. No.8468730   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8468670

Anon was obviously trying to discredit the graphic by "catching" loose speech by the poster.

We don't need to "assume" anything about the post Q replied to there, and I haven't even carefully examined that graphic. What is obvious is that posts that Q replies to can figure into Q proofs. This has been shown over and over again. It makes no difference who actually posted the prior posts.