>>8469429 pb
That's my post w/ the link to the hyroxychloroquine for sale, FDA approved, available in the US, right now, with a prescription.
The FDA needs to approve this for treatment and prevention of C19, immediately.
The FDA is telling us it's not safe enough, but it's been available since 1949. The FDA prefers crashing the economy to approving a drug that has been available in the US for 71 years to treat and prevent a virus that has only been around for 3 months.
We all know that it takes a really really long time to get that whole double blind placebo, blah blah peer reviewed BS done. Like a year, or more. And the FDA thinks that people starving, becoming poor, dying - are all better options than skipping all that double blind peer review stuff. This drug has been on the market for 71 years.
I'm actually pretty pissed off that the FDA has been doing this. And I've been posting pretty often the last few days about the various treatment options that I'm finding.
I do a google search, last hour, antiviral. So I find the newest stuff if there's anything.
The recent news wasn't just about Hydroxychloroquine / chloroquine and the rest of the quinine analogues. (I just went to the store and bought what Tonic Water - with Quinine - that I could). There is also Favipiravir,
"Patients who were given the medicine in Shenzhen turned negative for the virus after a median of four days after becoming positive, compared with a median of 11 days for those who were not treated with the drug, public broadcaster NHK said."
Gets rid of C19 in 4 (Four) days. This drug hasn't been around for 71 years though. It seems like the Quinine drugs, which work, in part, by raising the pH, making more alkaline.
("Chloroquine is known to block virus infection by increasing endosomal pH required for virus/cell fusion")
What is interesting is that it was learned long ago that CANCER requires an ACID environment, just like this virus does.
There was a mouse test a while back. They gave the mice tumors, and they gave some mice BAKING SODA and other mice didn't get the BAKING SODA. The mice that got the BAKING SODA LIVED TWICE AS LONG. They still died, but if you had cancer, and baking soda would let you live twice as long, you'd take baking soda, right? It's not a cure, but something that lets you live twice as long is kinda like a cure. Why don't we all know that baking soda "kinda" cures cancer.
The way baking soda works is that it alkalizes the blood, and cancer, as well as most of the dysfunctions, tends to prefer an acid environment. When it faces a alkaline environment, it doesn't do well. With the mice, the tumors grew, but they didn't spread, there weren't new tumors, no metastatising (sp?) Because a little tumor chunk just couldn't make it through the alkaline blood. But the tumors grew, because baking soda just couldn't get into the tumor, the tumor has defenses against that. The tumor eats sugar, that's what it wants, not alkaline baking soda.
Someone figured out how to get baking soda into tumors that didn't want to let baking soda in. Mix with maple syrup, which is 1) a sugar that tumors will eat and 2) has a structure that allows baking soda to hide. (Trojan Horse analogy here). Tumor eats the baking soda and is surprised to find baking soda hiding inside, and the high pH baking soda kills the tumor.
Here's the mouse baking soda study from Pubmed.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19276390
Bicarbonate increases tumor pH and inhibits spontaneous metastases.