Oh gosh wouldn't that be nice
Check news, but planes are able to turn off their tracking somehow, or maybe it is done after they land. (tracking you watch, is on a delay)
Quite a number on the flight tracker do disappear in the course of a day and obviously planes are not dropping out of the sky each day.
Rumored, never confirmed.
You know, one good way to check these before getting freaked out, if it is a major airline just go to the Web site and enter the flight # and see if it landed safely.
The flight tracker data is on a delay from like 15 min to a couple hours, so you can virtually be assured that commercial planes will be recorded as landed in the airline flight status screen — if indeed the plane landed safely.
Yes the George thing was on there when he posted it, I thought it meant Bush but still dont know for sure.
>>84934
>Fuck off kike
I was referring to your original flight freak out, the one to Austin, which has landed.
I am starting to think you are a fucking idiot.
The flight tracker is not in real time because that would be a big security risk.
Does your mind comprehend this?
Or are you sniffing too much glue?
You are watching OLD DATA some of which is hours old. We had an Air Force fag explain this --- but it makes common sense. Why would real time data be available to people who might want to cause mischief?
Or idiots like yourself who have who-knows-what going on in their heads?
No, the flight tracker is a picture of what happened in the past, earlier in the day. If military planes, you can be sure it was hours earlier.
Don't walk with sharp objects.
>>84950
If it is military it can be hours, if commercial 15 min to an hour. I don't know about private planes.
You can get a good gauge just by keeping the flight tracker in one tab and the airline web site in another, and compare a few landing times.
Landing in real time is always going to be sooner but how much sooner can vary.
That is where his jet lands, so he would have to be there for some span of time.
Huh. Q is an aficionado of the cinema all right.
Good find, anon. That may well be our George.
>>85074
Welp, that explains how she got into Congress.
He tends to have a great record for accuracy.
On the other hand, the last thing we need is another purveyor of free beer tomorrow.
Aah, just replace all the text with something like Bookman. That will look plenty real enough for cover text.
People will get the message loud and clear and most wont even notice.
From all I have seen watching them for many years, SPLC is widely considered one of the most corrupt organizations in the world.
So you want to apply the "opposite" rule to anything they write about you:
If SPLC writes respectful words about someone, that someone is likely a criminal.
Nice
Very good memerization, anon
This will be the first test of who is right about Gowdy, perhaps.