"You didn't correct the language. I wonder if you agree with it. Do you believe that China is inflicting this upon our country?"
"No I don't believe they are inflicting. I think that they could have given us a lot earlier notice, absolutely" at 48:10
wouldn't embed:
https://youtu.be/JgDcS-ZBH0k?t=2889
If he's playing cards then isn't he sharing virus by touching the cards and dealing the cards?
so who is he playing with?
It's such a groomer's paradise.
it would make more sense if it wasn't a bunch of trained pony people. If everyone was as well coached . . . but it's only for the idle, the rich, or the shopped to coach types. The rest of us have to sit back and let them be fabulous.
Gave that up in the 1980's. These created people aren't there of their own talent, but because they were propped up by an overly-interested adult.
overly interested in one and not all.
what kind of creep (1) produces a picture like that of herself. (2) has it photo shopped to make it look like a finished image. (3) publishes it of herself doing that.
seriously creepy. And you put it here twice, like you promote it (oh I know you'll say 'oh no anon not me')_
the obliscks were throphy's.
Research where they came from and find a curious relationship.
The London/Paris/Manhattan/Rome oblisks came from . . .
maybe someone should send them back?
the one at the Foreum in rome is dated to having been brought to Rome in 8AD, so it's been there a very long time. Long before the Freemasons made up all their fake history and claimed everything as if their ancestors invented it, usurping and mocking all while doing that.
you posted it TWICE.
you only needed to put it there once.
learn the etiquette of exposing without glamorizing or presenting the stuff that they want us all to see in a way that suits their purposes. You spread their curse by being so . . . unaware of your presentation. How is that for digging into your issues? Dig dig dig.
now show five pictures of some witch with a voodoo curse look. Or a staute of your idol Baffy.
you project your BS to all here. I'm merely snark-tificating on the events of the day and trying to engage intelligent and non-jingo-saying interaction.
but you're going to say I'm Baffy. I'm not Baffy.
ya, those are good questions to red pill people!
And you ask it and you don't need to say why you think, if you do, because we don't really have any sauce as to why. And you can't really use the narrative 'oh, just be accepting and forgiving' because admission that something was incongruent and immoral means that something needs to be done to mitigate the injustice of that kind of culture of abuse and trafficking.
I think the answers come out in people's minds just from the questions.
as far as 'two images', I get why people do that. One is for the view of the post where you got the image, it proves where it came from. The second is to allw someone to meme with it.
I suppose I didn't consider that when I was all like 'two of that horror image' and 'go post your hero baffy' what a stupid and lame headed thing for me to say!!!
but it does upset me when I see an oer abundance of that kind of image, it's like someone is trying to promote that crap.
so I may have been a little bit out of control in my tact in that post, saying that Baffy is someone who the other anon enjoys or uses as a reason for some idol idea, whatever that is.
like , for example, photos of Santeria ritual rather give out the effect that the ritual was for, and almost, in that respect, the evidence almost further's the crime.
sadly we still need evidence to have prosecution of such events (if they sacrificed live animals!).
but they will say 'oh, freedom of religion.'
or is that a fake narrative too?