HA ha
lurk moar kiddo
so why aren't buddhists going around gunning down carnivores
> Gateway Pundit
consistently publish wild claims and promises for clicks and never follow-up anything.
too much cries of wolf = no credibility whatsoever.
BUT MAYBE with a showing of a track record not so disgustingly embarassing, i might some day click one of their links again
> rather than defend
didn't defend a thing, just asked a question: if your aim is to eliminate ANY & ALL suffering and you include animals, why are you letting carnivores eat up their frens?
fakepic
hm, when they're legit. ie, sometimes.
mostly just convenience/a best-of posts.
don't really care much about them anymore.
tons of time&effort wasted on arguing over what goes in, what doesn't, what it means, etc, etc.
too much neurotic focus on sauce (which is 99% of the time just MSM)
too much notable-worship.
but taking them out would be MUCH worse, as has been demonstrated in the past.
anons go on
if China wasn't an assbackwards communist totalitarian shit hole
regardless, normies on twitter all suddenly going wild on Opera is BY DEFINITION something "notable".
<not. an. endorsement.
>This was one of those times.
yup, shame for gatewaypundit they burned through their credit, eh