Anonymous ID: 8028f9 March 19, 2020, 7:01 p.m. No.8482927   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2991 >>3035 >>3079

Anons, help.

 

Really got into it with a friend of the family

who's been around since I was little.

 

They're like in their early 70's.

 

Anyway, it all started with just a matter-of-fact

observation about how national emergency

wasn't declared until 1,000 deaths for the

H1N1, and the deaths were around the

mid-40's, give or take, for the WuFlu.

 

Typically, you'd get, what you would expect

to be a "normal" reaction of shock or

surprise.

 

But not here.

 

He kept harping on how it took 4 months

for something to be done, yada-yada, and

how POTUS fired the department that

would be handling this type of crisis

(which I didn't have a complete answer for

because I only knew cursory info regarding

that) and then it went to bringing up

Hitler and how ex-Mrs. Trump said he

used to read Mein Kampf at night because

he kept it in the dresser by the bed or

something like that.

 

The article I found, this one, said it wasn't

Mein Kampf, but a collection of Hitler's

speeches.

 

Could use help from you guys who are excellent

at digging and debating and how you think it

would be best to proceed?

 

Not quite sure yet, if they're a lost cause.

 

They were not completely gung-ho for

Hildabeast, but, looking back, I guess

they have been Anti-Trump since 2016

and are obvious MSMers, even to the point

of saying the reason media coverage of

Trump is negative is because it's all

true.

 

They also cited BBC and I told them BBC

was just UK's equivalent of CNN and they're

just as leftist.

 

Any links and topics and strategies for

red-pilling would be appreciated.

 

I've pulled a bunch for the media side-by-sides

from the Side-by-Side board.

 

kek

MAGA

Anonymous ID: 8028f9 March 19, 2020, 7:08 p.m. No.8483028   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8482991

5:5

 

Was planning on giving it that last heave-ho

before calling it a day since this was first

time debate really came up.

 

Last time, I was more an observer with

no input in the conversation.