first of all, if your gonna tell anons to visit a website to confirm your bullshit, the least you can do is provide the sauce. pic related is the only search result i got. if you are passed the paywall then post the records.
it was posted earlier, unconfirmed and unlikely imo. when the vid is released it will be after it has been used in a conviction, as part of the evidence of the case. not prematurely leaked on the dark web.
>Did NYPD make copies and distribute them to unknown 3rd parties as a dead man's drop?
its possible, but theres no evidence that im aware of to support that theory. also, when NYPD got the laptop, their warrant only applied to weiners comms as related to his pedo activity. which means if evidence of a different crime was obtained from files, or emails that were not relevant to the weiner case, they were obtained illegally, then illegally distributed. this would disqualify as evidence in a criminal case. the current "dark web killary video" is fake. its not the first time we've seen this.
>First and foremost, the gathering or use of evidence must not violate your constitutional rights
https://www.lawfirms.com/resources/criminal-defense/criminal-defense-case/evidence-at-trial.htm