Anonymous ID: 5f282e March 20, 2020, 7:25 p.m. No.8496617   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Damn, missed dropping this on the heel of last loaf. Fckit.

 

>>8496077 (PB)

>>8495959 (PB)

>>8495935 (PB)

>REAL anons don't give a fuck if they had one to give.

Ackchyually, I'm a generous anon, and am flush-up with fucks. Here are THREE Fucks. One for each of you. Now shove them up your collective asses and fuck off!

Anonymous ID: 5f282e March 20, 2020, 8:17 p.m. No.8497268   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8497162

>The only way the operators could've know this was the moment to execute this plan was if they themselves released the "virus"

You've hit on the crux of my unease past couple days. All is bright but this nagging question.

Known but unstoppable?

Known but perfectly legal to thwart with some secret doctrine?

 

Same as the legal doctrine used with 9/11.

We 'knew' the intentions of the highjackers and terrorists. The 'idea' of that particular threat in the world, the noosphere, was real, as evidenced by ongoing actions by bad actors to secure planes, train themselves, etc.

BUT, knowing the hijackers were complete amateurs, and they'd never finish the job, we had the pretext needed for the legal doctrine, now just to help them execute a bit better. No, can't chance this, future is at stake, how about we take over this terrorist op and do it right for you?

Don't worry, we'll still let you claim you did it and get all the glory.

 

Sure hope some of the hidden Legal Doctrines are brought to light through this.

But KungFlu doesn't bode well for breaking the pattern, just more of the same.