Tough crowd.
Now compare it with how often similar EQs occur in that location.
There's not enough evidence to say as if fact "we blew up a DUMB".
That is a possibility and something we are always watching for.
But it's wrong to state it as fact.
Unless you bring more sauce.
Anon has been watching CA EQs for years and years and has often seen quakes M4-5 off the coast near Petrolia.
Be careful making unsupported assertions. If you say it's your inference or opinion or speculation or hypothesis, that is fine. But you didn't say that.
Or did he already….
O hai
>>8381854 PB at 2020-03-12 00:35:21 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #10730: The Wuhan Watch Edition
>>8381784 PB
>the Pirbright Coronavirus patent
Are those 2 websites AIM projects, Douglas?
I hate disinformation.
It was established that the Pirbright patent is for a coronavirus with a different genetic sequence.
>>8308445 #PB# at 2020-03-03 17:54:55 (UTC+1)
Guys, the coronavirus in the patent isn't the covid-19 coronavirus from Wuhan.
You can read the genetic sequence of the patented virus in the patent itself:
https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-11-20-US-Pat-No-10130701-CORONAVIRUS-Assignee-THE-pirbright-INSTUTUTE-Woking-Great-Britain-funded-by-Wellcome-Trust-and-Gates-Foundation-USPTO-Nov-20-2018.pdf
It starts on page 21, column 8, and the sequence starts with ACTTAAGATAGATA.
You can get the sequence for the covid-19 virus on GenBank:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947
It starts with ATTAAAGGTTTATACCTTCC.
The protein sequences in the patent don't match the proteins listed on GenBank either.
It's a completely different virus.
——————————————–
It's gotten rather tiresome reposting this refutation.