>>8498664 pb

I wrote something what seems like a week ago but it was probably last night or the night before.

The FDA vs Walmart.

Walmart gives away free hydroxychloroquine - or does something like that - and Trump is on the side of Walmart.

It's quite amazing that the FDA thinks that its rules are so unbreakable, but our constitutional rights to assemble can be broken. These FDA regs, it looks like right now, suck. So, change them. Trump works with Walmart to get those Quinine drugs in peoples hands they take them, the virus is knocked down. And Fausi is the bad guy in all of this. The head of the FDA seems like a bad guy, there seem to be a lot of bad guys here.

Release the Cures is something that we were taught by Q to practice. Maybe Release the Cures is something Q wants us to say right now. Perhaps in meme form

It seems that, maybe, what Q has been doing is telling us events that he/it/they knew were coming, and giving us our talking points years in advance.

Because Release The Cures is really something we could be saying right now.

>>8498948

It's not going to be someone who doesn't appear in the mainstream conspiracy theories. That name just doesn't appear in conspiracy theories. It's not a famous enough name. Someone who few heard of has been controlling things behind the scenes? I don't think so. Nobody really has a great answer other than "Rothschild again". If Pope actually means Vatican, that's plausible. You have kings and queens that are plausible, but really you have Rothschild.

>>8499023

I'm going to go with NO on that.

Rothschilds have been doing huge shit for 200 years, but they can keep their name out of the papers.

Let's put it this way, we know the Rothschilds resume.

Whoever wants to argue that someone is bigger than the Rothschilds over the last 200 years needs to come up with a resume that exceeds Rothschilds.

The argument that goes something like this "oh, but it WOULD be someone without a huge resume, here's someone without a huge resume" seems like bs.

Let's just assess all the resumes.

>>8499116

I wouldn't discount it entirely, but I didn't see the strongest case for it.

My take is that Rothschild is at the top.

What happened to the Mayflower types who used to run things, supposedly? You have Rothschild come here, through agents, a major Jew banker helping to make a lot of other Jews rich. And we know all about all that. Owning a Central Bank is big money. Maybe we're right around the corner from the Rothschilds getting really fucked. Big Ol' Jubilee, and then a reset, a new banking system with the Rothschilds having no part of it.