Last time I was here I left you all with a propaganda stream that led to the idea that homosexuality = pedophile = guilty until proven innocent.
I trusted the crowd to straighten it out. How'd ya'll do?
And to the extent it is not yet common knowledge that we must, especially in matters of justice where people's lives and freedom are at stake, await first-hand verifiable factual information, rather than internet rumor, or photos of people standing next to each other at some party, to decide someone is a pedophile who should be quarantined, what does that say about the efficacy of real-world examples of unfettered speech, anarchic crowd sourcing of news, organic citizen compilation of information shaping opinion?
(sample size. there must be enough people aware of and participating in a system over a long period of time to begin to evaluate the efficiency of the system, think wikipedia the first week vs now)