Anonymous ID: 5d5b34 March 31, 2018, 9:28 a.m. No.850877   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>850641

Amazon isn't a public utility like Facebook and Twitter, its a horizontally integrated conglomerate. Amazon Cloud Services, Amazon Retail, and Amazon Digital Media needs to be split into 3 independent companies that compete with each other and can't be used to leverage advantages over firms competing in other areas. Netflix is hosted on Amazon hardware. Amazon also provides similar services. Because Amazon allows this to happen and netflix has been successful does not mean they are not more subtly violating anti-trust laws. If netflix wanted to start producing conservative programming, could bezos lean on them to stop it? I don't know that he would, but the possibility existing disincentives Netflix from even considering upsetting their cloud overlords.

 

We need to take a hard look at how anti-trust laws SHOULD work. Just because we have anti-trust laws on the books that Amazon(and Facebook, twitter, etc) is in compliance with, does not mean they are producing effective policy. We need congress to actually do their job and set the framework for the FTC to do their job.

 

They have very little willpower to upset the status quo. Breaking up Amazon is not the same thing as killing Amazon. The successor firms would be offering the exact same services as they are today. Amazon would lose some of its scale advantages creating upward pricing pressure, but it would also face new competitive pressure pushing prices down. Amazon and its shareholders would lose, but the american people would be rescued from the inevitable march towards Amazon Hegemony.

Anonymous ID: 5d5b34 March 31, 2018, 10:03 a.m. No.851119   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1183 >>1271 >>1316 >>1432

>>850883

Q has clearly stated he provides some disinformation. If Q provides specific information that would necessarily be classified, assume it is false. It would be a felony to do so and likely hurt any future criminal prosecutions.

False information can still put us over the correct targets.

 

I see the Q crumbs as targeting information. He is tagging the corruption and evil for the anon digging artillery to hit. He's not giving us an intelligence briefing. At this point, i assume Q-team and Potus know the truth. Much of this knowledge about the truth was acquired by clandestine intelligence activities whose evidence is not admissible in court. These forums assist the DoJ and various other agencies involved to establish parallel construction in order to prosecute the biggest law enforcement investigation in human history. The Q-team folks who eat our bread don't need us to uncover new aspects of corruption(although i suspect we occasionally do). It only takes a couple of people who know the truth to parse our ideas. We are crowdsourced to provide ideas that are occasionally useful for building the case.

 

The obvious other function is a slow injection of truth and openness to ideas that would be hard to accept to the general population. Are memetic warfare keeps the MSM and their overlords on the defensive. 18,000 sealed filings…how many corrupt assholes are wondering if their name is one while they are home for the holidays. Imagine their anxiety when that black sheep cousin mentions roseanne or Q at the table. Fear of public shame and humiliation is rising and embarrassing your family and legacy when you make your perp walk for corruption is a reality.

 

The fear makes them circle their wagons at first, but as soon as the ranks are broken, there will be a fast and furious scramble to run or cut deals. This is why McCabe was such a big deal. The old guard couldn't protect a Captain. This is why we haven't seen that high profile arrest yet. As soon as one happens all the other dominoes will fall in a matter of days.

Anonymous ID: 5d5b34 March 31, 2018, 10:41 a.m. No.851346   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1365

>>851312

 

I suspect this is the kid they wanted to be the face instead of Hogg. Then we pointed out Peddo-Elsagate-adoption scam Dad. This kid is far more intelligent than Hogg.