Anonymous ID: 352846 March 21, 2020, 7:30 p.m. No.8509809   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9868 >>9915

>>8509702

>>8509710

baker's checks

Yes, bakers were the ones MOST IN FAVOR of baker checks, including me

It was @fastjack that said bakers were becoming "complacent" and refused to do 'em anymore.

they were also a nice way of connecting with BVs, who would give a greeting during checks.

 

"COMPLACENT"

When everyone knows that ONLY BO/BVs can really check hashed id's. What a farce.

Anonymous ID: 352846 March 21, 2020, 7:41 p.m. No.8510058   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0107 >>0226 >>0252

>>8510001

Yes, half the bakers left last Spring bc of the intensity of the attacks and anon uncertainty about the situation (BO had no yet taken over). We are stronger now, more united and core bakers have been here long enough that anons can't be easily fooled. No, bakers are not perfect. But they are patriots.

Anonymous ID: 352846 March 21, 2020, 7:47 p.m. No.8510198   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8510126

anon, i was baking around thenโ€“maybe just before, i tried to pick up Fauci material.

Did you use bold or red text to call attn to the post? that really helps.

Bakers have a hard time with anon analyses, alsoโ€“hard to evaluate quickly, not enough time, i run even on graveyard these days. We wait for anons to look at them bc they have much more time.

o7