Normie news coz muh tv star. For normies, nothing is real until it's on muh tv.
He's attacked the board repeatedly and is a useless glowfag clown nigger shill.
He thought he was going to destroy the board, but I decided to destroy him by myself.
These assholes need to be eliminated period
Commerce is supposed to be free per the Constitution, which includes delivery of items. Duh!
There's a SCOTUS case that states the police have NO duty to protect and serve the People, and the real duty of the police is to enforce the revenue code AGAINST the People. That's why the Coward County Sheriff will have no liability for the Parkland failure, they had no duty to protect.
THE POLICE ARE ONLY THE THUGGISH STREET FACE OF AN EXTREMELY CORRUPT GOVERNMENT. THE POLICE STATE HAS GOTTA GO OR WE GET NOTHING OUT OF THIS.
Kek
Definitely, and the District Courts recently re the travel bans.
Trump has mentioned several times over the past couple years that Amazon has "antitrust problems." Look for action in that area. Trust-busting like T Roosevelt did.
What I say is correct.
There are few evidentiary restrictions in Mil Tribunals. Pretty much everything may be considered. Evidentiary exclusions are mainly about juries. A judge in a case sees all evidence while ruling it's admissible, or not. No jury in a Mil Tribunal, only 3 judges, and all lawyers and court personnel are military, including the appellate panel.
Geometric figures can be imposed on anything. I see it all the time in fibonacci analyses of Art works. It's 90% bullshit .
TSA must go period
7 of 10 anons would Fuck Julia, Marry a Baker Girl, Kill LAIMfaggot.
Pepe approves this message.
Agree. I no longer disseminate Q "predictions." I just believe what I see and will explain what I know if asked.
Normies ONLY believe in muh tv.
Yes, it appears so, because the hearsay exclusion doesnt apply. It will be weighed for its value rather than rejected.
Under the procedures, however, a person can be convicted in a commission trial by a two-thirds majority of the commissioners: Unanimous verdicts are not required. Evidence, including previous trial testimony and written statements, will be admissible if it tends to prove or disprove the case at hand. The exclusionary rule, which keeps illegally seized evidence out of a civilian criminal trial, does not apply. The procedures do not provide for appeals from a guilty verdict to civilian judges. They do, however, call for "reviews" of a verdict by a three-member panel selected by the secretary of defense. No verdict will be final until approved by the president or the secretary of defense .
Fuck off, moron. Just because an agency exposes crimes doesnt make it lawful and constitutional. It's stupid people like you who are ruining this country. Fucking sheeple.
I wish the BO would ban flat earth faggotry. It's off-Q.
What's an "orbit?"
Namefaggots know nothing. Namefaggots must die.
Here. ———-→ Q
Understandable.
A demoncrat saying "debunked" = true. It's always opposite day with these lying fucktards.