>>8521681 pb
Springmeier himself admitted that all his info was from one informant and that he could not vouch for it 100%
Anyone who read the book carefully would know that.
It's not hard evidence but just suggestive. It has to be supported with moar than just that document.
"Q" statements are totally ambiguous
There is an identity for "P" and it's a person? Isn't it? "Payseur" is a family, not a person.
"P" also is a position. Since "P" sits in the Chair. "P" changes. There's probably a succession? Wouldn't you imagine that?
I've thought since the beginning the "Payseur" push was an -op. Just not enough data for how hard it's being pushed.
Now even the "Leo Payseur" - he appears to be Satanist/ whatever Horror-Art fan? But there a lot of people out there exactly like him, who are simple ordinary workers / owners / individuals.
He could even be LARP-ing. Has anyone actually met or interviewed him?
Investigator has to really learn about the subject. Info gathered from Twitter or Instagram can only go so far.
Meet the person in question, interview them, before making a claim.
Leo P. has not been featured in any of the Q images? Right? Name was never mentioned.
Compared to many others.
This is Q research. We can speculate on who is "P"? But why would anons claim it was Leo P's family without any real data except "they are so big they can hide everything"
That doesn't mean what you write about them is not true. It's just means there is no evidence for it. All speculation.
The fact the writer claims it's "been proved' makes me think it's an op/digression. Since the promoters are less than honest.
For instance, this is an actual image "Q" provided us.
Can you point in that picture one person who is of that Payseur family?