Anonymous ID: d18550 March 22, 2020, 6:29 p.m. No.8525177   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8525139 pb

Posts about ELlen make me think… ouch when it comes out about these creeps, many will defend them.

If people are defending them on this Board. What happens, on like. Facebook?

Ouch

Celebrity Worship.. is a sickness. People are so into it, that they defend it.

Disgusting.

As commercials. I used to have friends defend commercials. Woew. That's deep.

Anonymous ID: d18550 March 22, 2020, 6:40 p.m. No.8525315   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5340

>>8525276

Michael pulled a fake death.

It looked like that; either that or murder.

Guess it was "fake death"

Maybe that's why Hanx is now the leader; everyone waiting for what he's going to do. People calling out, begging him to answer. All saying how everyone love[s]ed him.

No wonder he got to play the voice of God at the Planetarium.

Our gut instinct was to hate that guy, about like Obama - just smell the fraud oozing out.

Anonymous ID: d18550 March 22, 2020, 6:46 p.m. No.8525372   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8525276

Proved by shill

Chin is wrong ? Sure it is, but Hanx is not a clone. There was a mother involved.

Also, total match on the son.

I couldn't figure how that was TH's son, 'til I saw the image of the grand-Dad

Now the bit with Hanx in his first movie attempting suicide off the top of a Trade Tower NYC makes moar sense.

Family built it and designed the whole 9/11 Satanic ruse.

Anonymous ID: d18550 March 22, 2020, 7:02 p.m. No.8525576   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8525519

Good post. The Bakers are a conservative bunch.

They are learning how to Notable something truly Note-Worthy but not agreed upon - needing further context, by writing . "Contested comparison of Hanx and missing Rockefeller"

Just to keep people from fighting over it.

Some really dumb lame and worthless material gets in Notable Baker,

If it's bland - from the NYTimes or some other shit source, they decide it "passes muster"

"People should know about it, even if it's wrong or slanted"

"People should know what THEY are saying"=

But if it's an anon sourced, they will err on the side of caution, for lack of confidence.

That might change. Who knows.

But great post.