>>8538304 (LB)
>that's what I heard as well. the lab was known to sell its test animals at the market… makes sense, at least, if one wanted to disguise an intentional release
The question is who much of the effects of the virus were part of the intent when it was released. Biden being sheltered is certainly convenient. But I don't believe there was sufficient urgency to do so way back in Nov/Dec when cases first started appearing.