My fellow Anons,

So I see that Q posted tonight. And I see the connection of the most recent post to these two posts, one signed Q and one signed R. The connection is obvious.

So here's my question. I vaguely remember a series of posts by 'R' - did anyone archive these?

I know they are probably LARP posts, and I paid them no mind at the time. I completely ignored them, and I remember nothing of them.

However, in light of today's Q post, I would like to give them a second look. Not expecting much, but it's bugging me.

I could go digging though my bread archives, but that would be a lot of work just to satisfy a curiosity. I might do it, but if any anons archived them specifically, I would be much obliged.

Thanks

>>8542336

Yep. There's more to it… but house cleaning the D side is important. I think it was always part of the Plan…. I don't know how well it's going, it's hard to see from my perspective as a libertarian. Maybe AOC is good for the party and good for the country. Maybe the rest of the squad and Tulsi Gabbard are also 'good' in the sense that anyone who stands up to Pelosi, Schiff, DiFi, Waters and Schumer will be helping to push out a corrupt pay-for-play Democrat establishment. It's hard to see this clearly when they push what I see as climate change junk-science so hard, but maybe there are layers to it…

>>8542648

Thanks anon, that's exactly what I was look for.

>>8542690

I might worship Satan too if God had made me that fucking ugly.

>>8542745

God Bless You.

>>8542820

YOU GLOW.

>>8542849

Wrong on both. I guess you read my post on the 'R' subject. It was just a question.

I know the 'R' thing has been used by the MSM to apply the 'conspiracy' label. I'm not someone stupid enough to rave about muh Q is JFK on twatter.

I'm just revisiting an old subject because of today's Q post.

If you don't want to help, that's fine, I'll do my own research.