Anonymous ID: 6764c3 March 24, 2020, 5:07 p.m. No.8552668   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2683 >>2744 >>2789 >>2870

>>8552646

>NS crew

NS?

But what you see as "namefagging" is just a way for anons to check the baker isn't a shill; it's just IDs. Bakers could just be Baker#1, Baker#2, etc but some would infer that as a rank instead of a non-hierarchical label.

Anonymous ID: 6764c3 March 24, 2020, 5:10 p.m. No.8552693   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2705 >>3056

>>8552683

Anyone can bake though. Do you want to bake?

It's not gatekeeping, as for influencing notables, just nominate the posts you think should be in notables. You can't complain if you didn't nominate a post or say a post shouldn't be in.

Anonymous ID: 6764c3 March 24, 2020, 5:20 p.m. No.8552798   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2825 >>2863

>>8552744

>Night Shift Crew

Ah thanks. Didn't get that but that's an easy one I probably should've.

The what you and other anons see as "namefagging" which imo isn't started because there were legitimate shills trying to hijack baking early on /qresearch/, so a pastebin system was started where an incoming baker would post his pastebin account with the post he was posting to verify it wasn't a shill. The nickname was just a way to ID a baker, but some just did random numbers or something.

It worked for a while when there wasn't the BO or a BV to do a manual check which worked well too.

Both systems are gone now and the remnants of that system are now seen as namefagging by some.

Anyone can bake though.

You can practice on >>>/comms/, and there's no pastebin account (which is free) needed at all.

>>8552746

I didn't read any of your posts. Working on a graphic and not paying that close attention to the breads honestly.

>>8552789

If you think the CM actually cares who's making new threads on one board on 8kun you're an idiot.

Anonymous ID: 6764c3 March 24, 2020, 5:23 p.m. No.8552850   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2893

>>8552825

>you've shilled against them all day

I think you're confusing me with someone else, I'm just addressing your thoughts on baking.

I didn't even realize you were talking about your wall of text until after I replied originally.

Please link to what you think are my previous posts. Do it.

Anonymous ID: 6764c3 March 24, 2020, 5:28 p.m. No.8552906   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8552870

I 100% disagree notables are a disease. They're a great way to allow anons to catch up on note worthy posts from the breads they miss and are a group of great information to be spread, which is the point of this information operation.

The famefaggotry is the disease, not notables or baking (which is a necessary function of a general thread anyway).

Anonymous ID: 6764c3 March 24, 2020, 5:35 p.m. No.8553010   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3050 >>3144

>>8552976

Useless fucks.

>>8552979

There are double meanings to a lot of comms from Q.

For example JC = [JC] = = [James Comey] James Comey; and JC = [JC] = [James Clapper] = James Clapper.

P = [P] = [Pope] = Pope; and P = [P] = [Payseur] = Payseur.

Context matters.