Neither are all bad.
There are sophisticated levels to this.
Masons are empirically a bit worse, however. Masons are purposefully very deceptive. Catholics are the simpler of the two.
Regardless of the nuance, neither are at fault for seeking camaraderie. Instead, its easier to point fingers at the people pulling both groups' collective strings.
Christians were, at one time, much closer to what we would call "Pagan" today. It used to be "Gnostic", but that frame of reference changed over time as well.
Essentially, those with ears to hear and with eyes to see where worn down and they forgot their ancestors' ways and abilities. We were made to forget quite a lot.
Should you shed the binding agents infecting you, convincing you to take whatever you're given, you'll come to learn that the first Christians were much much more spiritual, escoteric, occultic, whatever you want to call it.
The movement of The Christ has been so tampered with, so dulled, that we've all forgotten how we got here. Hell, even back in the early years of this great country, many many people still intimately appreciated what we would call astrology and many other more facets of the spiritual landscape.
Anyway, verbosity aside, Christianity was morphed in to "Paganism" to escape the Gnostic notions which first inspired it. Eventually, even the "Pagan" aspects were expunged so as to yet again change the story and obscure the old knowledge.
This is me showing you that they're doing it again. They're trying to stop the goyim, the profane, from knowing, or, more accurately, remembering.
No no
kek
I agree with you, anon.
The point was, though, that there's a good reason you can't list out back to back news sources suggesting similar of Masons. Neither are free from scrutiny.
I'm glad you've been paying attention.
Cainable
Cannibal
Jesus and Lucifer
Horus and Set
Thor and Loki
How sure are we that they aren't all just the same person?