That's nonsense.
It's some asian from /leftypol/ made about Qchads attacking shina.
Q !ITPb.qbhqo 21 Nov 2017 - 7:39:58 PM
Archive immediately.
Stringer = code = command.
What stringer was provided (2) days prior to event?
What were the keywords in the stringer?
Confirm.
Green (Yes).
Sky.
Why were keywords provided?
Guide to reading map?
Lord d R.
What was previously stated?
++
Who was the pilot of the plane?
Bad actor?
Who was the pilot of the helicopter?
Green?
What was countered?
Who was on the ground (outside) shortly before the collision?
Who was in the home shortly before the collision?
Learn to read the map.
We may have overestimated your ability.
Q
Took me a bit too. No problem anon.
Comped is a strong word though, that means they're actively working to subvert /qresearch/ because they're compromised.
If they're acting like a faggot, that's just being a faggot not comped.
kek true
So sick of the twitter/facebook/reddit-tier "proofs" that are barely even coherent side by sides being called proofs and a bunch of NPCs saying it's notable because there's lines and colors in it.
It's fucking annoying.
A lot of times the bakers are told, but two retards nominate it so it gets in. Not really the baker's fault in many cases, it's the retards nominating it and actually thinking it's a coherent graphic, not to mention a proof Q is an insider.
I sometimes agree, other times it's just stupid people.
Q proofs PROVE Q is an insider, not some incoherent "decode" where you make shit up to fit your graphic.