>>8566453, >>8566473 Obama Tweet: Q reference?

Looks to me like a threat. Saying that the White Hats better make a wise decision and not continue on the road they are on.

>>8568066

There have been a couple notable titties.

>>8568144

Possible, but not likely. I would say they range anywhere from 1 to 50 people per indictment, with the average being in the neighborhood of 3-5.

If was was the max, 5, we are looking at over 750,000 people implicated.

However, I think it would be closer to 2-3 because some people will be named in multiple indictments. I think a good number to rest on is 350,000 arrested.

What if Trump veto's the bill?

Dead cat bounce?

Already found another way to get money to the people?

>>8568430

Oh wow, ok. Didn't realize he always tipped his hand. He must be signing it then. / sarcasm

>>8568480

You missed some notable titties earlier.