>exact timecode of the R drop
actually one minute off, but overarching point in tact. I'm the one who noticed/posted it. The fact that then one q-drop separated it from the following one with 'the start' contained in it, only strengthened the point.
I recognized the timestamp immediately, because I'm that much of an R-tard. A such, anyone who thinks this isn't at least being back-door broadcasted as happening (whether mind-fuckery or not), hasn't looked into it sufficiently.
Yeah, like I said,
>anyone who thinks this isn't…happening…hasn't looked into it sufficiently.
Your stamp is just one more "evidence"
>What happened in 1909?
we lost everything
(perhaps defining "eve R Y thing" is key here?)
1 year after Tunguska [SKY] event. Won der if related?
>South Pole (Ernest Shackleton) and the Election of US President Howard Taff.
Ya know, ALL my life, I've looked past/looked right thru the particulars of names/their spelling/pronunciation as just incidental to the story, when in fact, MANY of the very best clues are hidden (in plain sight) in the names associated with the stories/events.
My ass is still kinda dumb on this matter, butt sounds to me like we somehow collectively lost our "inspiration"/A knowledge of some sort we had previously aT that time.
Is there a word/term for promoting a thing/concept via fake-degrading/attacking it? Like benevolent controlled opposition, but that's not quite right.
The concept of "all pres is good press" (because either way people become aware of something they weren't prior).
i.e. "These 911 truthers who think Building 7 was a controlled demolition planned long in advance are retarded loons who should be ignored."
Gotta be a term for that…but I don't know/can't find it. Since I brought it up, here's a useful GIF
sort of like Streisand Effect (but done intentionally)…I want the word/term describing "feigned opposition for the purpose of promoting"…it's not just "controlled oppo." What's the term? note that I'm courteously using very end of bread for this. Kek.