Hey baker
Nice work!
Can't take your handoff (eyes shot for now, kek)
Probably too early for late gy baker
So you may end up ghosting this one.
Below are some thoughts from LB re anon analyses, espec. graphics:
Writing descriptions of Q proofs and other anon graphical analyses is the hardest thing to do–also the hardest info for other anons to 'grok'
However, really great analyses tend to be transparent
But these are rare.
Anons sometimes think that graphics "speak for themselves"
This is seldom the case, even in the case of oldfag anons (also bakers, kek).
Trying to write an informative description is a good test:
if you–or those who nom your post–can't translate a pattern into words, then you may not have worked out the relationship as well as you think you have.
Thoughts?