>reverse dot blot hybridisation
looks like it has something to do with hybridizing dna test results to identify specific markers. but its hard to decipher all the scienceeze
https://www.interchim.fr/ft/9/98790r.pdf
https://www.biologyexams4u.com/2014/01/dot-blot-technique-definition-principle.html#.XnyWs3IpBc8
POTUS doesnt need to confirm Q. Q confirms themselves. normies have to discover Q before POTUS associates himself with it publicly. thats how the great awakening works. people can only be pointed in the right direction, to make the choice to know for themselves. they cant just be told what is legit , and what is not.
https://qmap.pub/proofs
all the newfags that thought freddy was a cool part of the board and enjoyed his trolling are eating crow now that his fakeQ.exe programming was installed. theres a reason he convinced you to like him before getting on the austin psyop.
we cant just shut down public multi billion dollar entities. everything must be done by the book. but we can hold them accountable for their crimes, and infiltrate them to influence their policies into the light. pic related.
i would usually see multiple newfag "hi freddy" or other interactive posts with freddy when he was harvesting shit lists, like they wanted so hard to fit in with a staple of the board, not realizing what it actually was.
if you were about to dissolve the corrupt banking system, and erase all of your debt to it, what would you do anon? i would exploit it for every dollar i could. incur as much debt as possible before erasing the debt, then erasing the inflation by introducing the gold standard. we are bleeding them dry and increasing americas wealth, in a wierd bassakwards way. trust the plan.
newfags, pay attention. they've been denying us technologies that would make the world better for decades, and they've been doing it in every industry possible. water/hydrogen fuel, is only one example.
its not true because its on the web. its true because the autists that have been doing this for far longer than Q has been around, dug on, and knew about stan meyer decades ago.
if you see an anon pointing out info, you should take a look at it and decide for yourself what it says. not just invalidate it because its on the web, and other anons know about something you dont.
>This stuff is easy to make
true. but once one of your neighbors calls the press to tell them about it, you have to tread very carefully to not sign your own death warrant.
confirmed bullshit.
go be troll somewhere else.
first you claim it was invalid for no reason, then you claim to be fully informed on the subject, and moar cause you been at it longer than me.
you even use one of your programmed trigger words (kid) in an attempt to divide.
weak anon.
oh its you. usually i filter as soon as i see your spammed screencaps. you've changed you post pattern, even harvested a couple (you)s. congratulations, youve leveled up shill. now goodbye.
>once you inform a certain % of the organism.
critical mass for mass acceptance is only 10 percent anon
http://www.trendsspotting.com/blog/?p=2123
its not about the easily obtained technology faggot. its the fact that they will kill you if you try to distribute it. why you troll so hard because i pointed old info to newfags, continue insults, and insinuate to be the only informed one here?
and you claim my mind is undeveloped?
good bye lowest ranking troll.
>to announce significant law enforcement actions relating to international narco-terrorism
eyes on.
you're in the midst of a CHINESE attack anon. liberals may be exploiting it, but thats because they are complicit. POTUS is acting. but youre forgetting how we got here. POTUS is even advocating for people to work, to save our economy from this attack which seeks to destroy us, in a storm of viral infection, propagated fear, and uncertainty. but all he's doing is stepping out of the way for the left? learn to fight back against those that would do you harm. not pass blame for your ignorance.
interdasting how sharing Q's post indicating the major chinese involvement in current affairs triggers shill replies, and the "you dont know anyone with covid" narrative.
i have anon. just a vocabulary oversight. its an important distinction. thank you.
i do, but if you give the trolls the (you), they just claim "muh false positives" to invalidate any possible known case. and immediately dismiss any anecdotal or observational data as not relevant.