Donald Trump’s Campaign Slaps TV Stations With Cease And Desist Letter To Try To Halt Ad Attacking His Coronavirus Response

Donald Trump’s reelection campaign has fired off a cease and desist letter to TV stations, warning them to stop airing an ad from a pro-Joe Biden Super PAC that is a scathing attack on the president’s response to the coronavirus crisis.

The spot features a graph mapping coronavirus cases in the U.S. over the past two months, with audio of comments Trump has made downplaying the threat of the virus.

In their letter to stations, the Trump campaign says that the Super PAC, Priorities USA Action, “stitched together fragments from multiple speeches by President Trump to fraudulently and maliciously imply that President Trump called the coronavirus outbreak a ‘hoax.’ They contend that Trump was in fact “talking about the Democrat’s politicization of the outbreak when he used the word ‘hoax.'” FactCheck.org noted that Trump told reporters the next day that he was not calling the virus a hoax, but the Democrats’ response to it.

At a Feb. 28 rally, Trump said, “They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation. They tried anything, they tried it over and over, they’ve been doing it since he got in. It’s all turning, they lost. It’s all turning, think of it, think of it. And this is their new hoax.”

The campaign threatens to take legal action, but it’s just as likely an attempt to try to call attention to Trump’s effort to refute the spot.

The Priorities USA Action ad does not explicitly say that Trump called the virus a “hoax.” It runs audio of Trump saying “This is their new hoax,” without identifying who he was talking about, as the number of coronavirus cases rises on the graph.

Josh Schwerin, senior strategist for Priorities USA, wrote on Twitter, “The Trump campaign is trying to bully TV stations into taking our ad down. They are not going to be successful because it is literally Trump in his own words. Let’s make sure as many people as possible see this ad.”

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/donald-trump-campaign-slaps-tv-042043827.html

>>8571117

Boomerang.

Likey. Likey a-lot

>>8571206

Absolutely.

These are the factors of who is living in 3D. Me, fear, lack program.

4D starting to understand the programs that keep us in 3D

5D Collective Consciousness and Unity. Knowing the Programs running those in 3D, but not getting sucked into that energy.

Lori Loughlin, co-defendants ask judge to toss charges in college admissions scandal

Lori Loughlin and 13 other parents charged in the college admissions scandal asked a judge on Wednesday to dismiss the fraud, bribery and money laundering charges lodged against them, arguing that federal prosecutors in Boston violated their rights and broke judicial rules by withholding for 16 months notes taken by the scam’s ringleader, William “Rick” Singer.

The motion marked the first time Loughlin and her co-defendants have asked a judge to toss the charges, the first round of which were unsealed a year ago. Their argument centers around notes Singer wrote in his iPhone, memorializing for his lawyer a series of interactions with government agents who handled his cooperation. He agreed in September 2018 to help federal authorities in Boston build cases against dozens of his current and former clients.

Twenty-two parents have pleaded guilty to an array of fraud and money laundering charges; all but one were sentenced to prison terms ranging from 14 days for Felicity Huffman, the award-winning television actress, to nine months for Douglas Hodge, the former chief executive of global investment firm Pimco.

Eight of the 14 parents who have maintained their innocence — a group that includes Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli — are scheduled to go to trial Oct. 5 in Boston. The remaining six are slated for trial in January. Singer has pleaded guilty to four felonies and has yet to be sentenced.

Singer, Loughlin’s attorney argued in the motion filed Wednesday, was “browbeat” by overzealous prosecutors and agents into twisting what he had previously told his clients — that their payments were not bribes, but donations to university accounts — to comport with the government’s theory that he and his clientele were entwined in a fraud, bribery and money laundering conspiracy. They point to a note in which Singer wrote he’d been instructed to “tell a fib” and characterize the payments as bribes.

Between the motion and several hundred pages of FBI interview reports, correspondence between government and defense lawyers and other records attached to the filing, a clearer picture emerged on Wednesday of how prosecutors discovered, then finally turned over the much-debated iPhone notes.

In early October 2018, two weeks after he began cooperating, Singer spoke for about 15 minutes on a recorded line with a prospective client, a Boca Raton father who wanted his daughter to attend Cornell. Singer explained to the father his “side door,” which would involve him making “a donation to the coach,” according to a transcript of the call.

When the father asked him to elaborate, Singer said: “Essentially, um, that donation is going to the — you know, to the program.” Afterwards, Singer fielded a “loud and abrasive call” from his handlers, he wrote in his iPhone.

“They continue to ask me to tell a fib and not restate what I told my clients as to where there money was going — to the program not the coach,” he wrote. While he told clients the payments were donations, "they want it to be a payment,” he wrote.

Read more here https://www.yahoo.com/news/lori-loughlin-co-defendants-ask-121012893.html