>>8572543 pb

Things somewhat interesting about the Chinese bullshit study is that

1) the Q drug cured 13 of 15 - which is a good result, to me.

2) they compared the Q drug to something else. That something else also did well. The headline should've been - good results from both treatments.

3) the French study compared the Q drug to NOTHING. The Q drug did much better than nothing. HCQ + Zpack - 100% vs nothing = close to 0%. The Chinese study was Q drug + ??? vs a "standard" treatment, which also contained drugs, and it worked. People are not arguing that the Q drug is the only possible treatment that will work. People are saying that the Q drug works, the Q drug is cheap and available, and it's been tested for safety by the FDA.

4) One main problem with the Chinese study was the headline written by Bloomberg.