Anonymous ID: afdde1 March 26, 2020, 1:46 p.m. No.8576065   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6089 >>6202 >>6269 >>6360

anons lawfag here

posted analysis of ex parte milligan last bred

other lawfag posted notable on insurrection act but this post did not provide the context for ex parte milligan which is crucial

milligan is NOT binding precedent on any court or on POTUS

it is NOT a SCOTUS decision

it is a DC district court decision and LINCOLN ignored it

so should we and so should POTUS

 

Read and rely upon the constitution not judges opinions

Article 1 deals with the powers and limits of CONGRESS

NOT POTUS

Article 2 deals with the powers and limits of POTUS

READ ANONS - there is NO limit on POTUS executive power NONE

this is what BARR has been saying for decades = unitary executive has the full and plenary power

Article 2 limits CONGRESS

the courts and congress WANT it to limit POTUS but IT DOES NOT

POTUS can suspend habeus whenever he chooses

the ONLY recourse Congress has is impeachment - PERIOD

all clear?

Anonymous ID: afdde1 March 26, 2020, 2:09 p.m. No.8576357   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6467

>>8576269

hey fren NO criticism or jab intended

sorry if it came off that way

im frazzled note i said milligan insted of merryman and im accidently conflating shit in my mind these days

your piece was fine

i just wanted to reinforce that MERRYMAN (kek) is not binding

carry on