Anonymous ID: 1d4235 March 26, 2020, 2:40 p.m. No.8576758   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6955

>>8576440 (lb) When Greenland first arose as an issue a couple of years back, unreliable polls said that most Danes were opposed to considering making a deal. But things may look vastly different in a couple of years. That may already be true, as the NWO losers in Copenhagen ram through legislation enabling forced vaccinations—a catastrophe. Meanwhile, the entire EU BS is teetering as their CB is on the verge of losing control. Italian banks may bring it all down pronto. Even aside from that, 20 years of looting by evil socialists has left Europe far weaker, especially with the truly evil measures to bring the dregs of the earth in. Looks to be going back to nation state blocs defending their own interests. Border patrols are already in effect, screw Schengen.

 

When one considers security measures, and the overall political situation, and then the impending mother of all financial crises, things may look far different to the average Dane before long, even as America rises like a giant. Even aside from everything else, Denmark may be forced to make a move as they see the Chinese panting to get Greenland as a gateway to the Arctic—something that America simply can & will not allow. So whatever offer we can come up with may look significantly better when one considers the context.

Anonymous ID: 1d4235 March 26, 2020, 2:54 p.m. No.8576955   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8576758 There are any number of ways to make a deal, aspects that could be used. Just one example is a net smelter royalty, such as mining industry uses regularly. So in addition to whatever else is offered, Denmark could retain a percentage of the mining wealth that would be pulled out of Greenland. Plus, America could maintain a defensive umbrella for them. Could make a favorable trade deal with them, from their viewpoint.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_smelter_return