Anonymous ID: b744b1 March 26, 2020, 11:07 p.m. No.8582120   🗄️.is 🔗kun

why the fuck do we still have namefags on this board

 

after all we've been through, ffs. get over yourself. you didn't do this shit by accident.

Anonymous ID: b744b1 March 26, 2020, 11:20 p.m. No.8582199   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2428

>>8582141

 

My take is that since we're going to have military trials, getting rid of habeas corpus is necessary to avoid quibbling about whether the arresting party (military) has the right to detain the prisoner (non-military, although perhaps we will designate them enemy combatants). The general sort of "do you have jurisdiction" bullshit games we'd not want to deal with if arresting more people than have ever been arrested in the US before. We have a precedent on this from the civil war:

 

Abraham Lincoln suspended it during 1863

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_Corpus_Suspension_Act_(1863)

 

See this section here:

 

"Numerous individuals were arrested, including John Merryman and a number of Baltimore police commissioners; the administration of justice in Baltimore was carried out through military officials"